DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSpyridakos, Athanasios-
dc.contributor.authorVryzidis, Isaak-
dc.contributor.authorPsomas, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorMimikou, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-02T11:30:12Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-02T11:30:12Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-01-
dc.identifierscopus-85055564461-
dc.identifier.issn1866-1505-
dc.identifier.issn1109-2858-
dc.identifier.other85055564461-
dc.identifier.urihttps://uniwacris.uniwa.gr/handle/3000/1727-
dc.description.abstractAn integrated methodological framework, combining methods for environmental analysis with multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA), is proposed for decision problems related to the selection of agricultural water management measures in river basins. The proposed framework for environmental analysis combines the driving forces–pressures–state–impacts–responses model with the water–energy–land–food (WELF) nexus model to ensure structured, comprehensive and systemic thinking regarding the definition of the alternatives, the points of view and the criteria of the decision problem. The MCDA framework follows a multi-attribute value/utility theory approach for the estimation of marginal value functions for the selected criteria. This process is supported by the multicriteria interactive intelligence decision aiding system. The estimation of points of view and criteria weights is conducted following the newly-established weights assessment through prioritisation method (WAP), which is supported by the relevant WAP software. The MCDA framework includes strong interaction with a decision maker (DM) to elicit the required information for the above methods. Feedback loops and indicators for robustness analysis are applied, aiming at concluding to a robust value system, which models the preferences of the DM as close as possible. An additive value model is used to aggregate all the criteria and express the global value of all examined alternatives. The framework concludes to a recommended alternative for selection by the DM. The strengths and weaknesses of the proposed framework are identified. The framework is applied in a demonstration example from the Pinios river basin in Greece to showcase its use. The outcomes on the potential WELF nexus trade-offs and the identified sources of uncertainty are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOperational Researchen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural wateren_US
dc.subjectDPSIRen_US
dc.subjectMAUTen_US
dc.subjectMCDAen_US
dc.subjectNexusen_US
dc.subjectWAPen_US
dc.titleMCDA approach for agricultural water management in the context of water–energy–land–food nexusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12351-018-0436-8en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85055564461-
dcterms.accessRights0en_US
dc.relation.deptDepartment of Business Administrationen_US
dc.relation.facultySchool of Administrative, Economics and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.volume21en_US
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage689en_US
dc.identifier.epage723en_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of West Attica (UNIWA)en_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
local.metadatastatusverifieden_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Business Administration-
crisitem.author.facultySchool of Administrative, Economics and Social Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgSchool of Administrative, Economics and Social Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Articles / Άρθρα
CORE Recommender
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
checked on Apr 8, 2025

Page view(s)

47
checked on Apr 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.